AVCG pathogenicity classifications
A citable reference table for variant pathogenicity across Dog, Cat, Horse. Every documented variant carrying a grade under the Animal Variant Classification Guidelines (AVCG; Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024), the ACMG/AMP-style framework for single-gene disorders in animals, curated in OMIA, here in one queryable place, each with its species, disease, HGVS, reference genome, and OMIA entry. Versioned: a classification updates as the evidence does.
A grade exists only where the evidence does. The absence of one is not a verdict of benign, only that the work has not been done yet, and the AVCG withholds a call as a VUS rather than guess. 142 classified, growing; not a claim of completeness. A grade describes the documented variant's causality, not a prediction for any individual animal.
| Grade | Species | Disease | Variant (cDNA) · reference | OMIA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pathogenic | Cat | Cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic, MYBPC3-related, autosomal dominantMondo↗ | c.2453C>T · p.(R818W) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 ⚠ The cDNA and protein annotations here are internally inconsistent (they cannot both be correct). Shown as-is from the source; our frame check flagged it for review. | OMIA:002951 |
| Pathogenic | Cat | Cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic, MYBPC3-related, autosomal recessiveMondo↗ | c.91G>C · p.(A31P) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:002952 |
| Pathogenic | Cat | classical Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (cEDS), COL5A1-relatedMondo↗ | c.504-2A>C · r.spl F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:002165 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Cat | classical Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (cEDS), COL5A1-relatedMondo↗ | g.93561989_93595728del F.catus_Fcat126_mat1.0 | OMIA:002165 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Cat | Dermatosparaxis Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (dEDS), ADAMTS2-relatedMondo↗ | c.698dup · p.(S235Qfs*3) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:000328 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Cat | Dihydropyrimidinase deficiencyMondo↗ | c.1303G>A · p.(G435R) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:001776 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Cat | Epidermolysis bullosa, junctionalis, COL17A1-relatedMondo↗ | c.3019+1del F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:002793 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Cat | Factor XII deficiencyMondo↗ | c.1631G>C · p.(G544A) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:000364 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Cat | Frontonasal dysplasia, ALX1-relatedMondo↗ | c.497_508del · p.(A166_T169del) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:002717 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Cat | Gangliosidosis, GM2, type II (Sandhoff or variant 0)Mondo↗ | c.1244-8_1250del · r.(spl?) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:001462 |
| Corroborated 2 independent sources agree (OMIA curation, Boeykens 2024). The evidence behind the grade:
The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Cat | Gangliosidosis, GM2, type II (Sandhoff or variant 0)Mondo↗ | c.40del · p.(L14Sfs*82) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:001462 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Cat | Gangliosidosis, GM2, type II (Sandhoff or variant 0)Mondo↗ | c.1467_1491inv · p.(F489Lfs*4) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:001462 |
| Corroborated 2 independent sources agree (OMIA curation, Boeykens 2024). The evidence behind the grade:
A computational predictor did not flag this variant; in-silico tools can be limited on complex or structural variants. The classification rests on the curated, corroborated evidence and is not overridden by a prediction. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Cat | Glycogen storage disease IIMondo↗ | c.1799G>A · p.(R600H) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:000419 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Cat | Glycogen storage disease IVMondo↗ | g.34574435_34612034delinsN[334] F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:000420 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Cat | Haemophilia BMondo↗ | c.1150C>T · p.(R384*) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:000438 |
| Corroborated 2 independent sources agree (OMIA curation, Boeykens 2024). The evidence behind the grade:
A computational predictor did not flag this variant; in-silico tools can be limited on complex or structural variants. The classification rests on the curated, corroborated evidence and is not overridden by a prediction. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Cat | Hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia, X-linked, EDA-relatedMondo↗ | c.1042G>A · p.(A348T) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:000543 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Cat | Hypotrichosis, HR-relatedMondo↗ | c.1402+2delinsCAG F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:002229 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Cat | Mannosidosis, alphaMondo↗ | c.1749_1752del · p.(Q584Afs) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:000625 |
| Corroborated 2 independent sources agree (OMIA curation, Boeykens 2024). The evidence behind the grade:
A computational predictor did not flag this variant; in-silico tools can be limited on complex or structural variants. The classification rests on the curated, corroborated evidence and is not overridden by a prediction. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Cat | Methaemoglobinaemia, CYB5R3-relatedMondo↗ | c.154-1G>C F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:002131 |
| Corroborated 2 independent sources agree (OMIA curation, Boeykens 2024). The evidence behind the grade:
The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Cat | Muscular dystrophy, Becker typeMondo↗ | c.8333G>A · p.(W2778*) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:001888 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Cat | Muscular dystrophy, Becker typeMondo↗ | c.8467C>T · p.(Q2823*) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:001888 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Cat | Muscular dystrophy, Duchenne typeMondo↗ | — | OMIA:001081 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Cat | Muscular dystrophy, Duchenne typeMondo↗ | c.4849C>T · p.(Q1617*) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:001081 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Cat | Myotonia | c.428_433+1del · p.(L143Qfs3*) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:000698 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Cat | Myotonia | c.991G>C · p.(A331P) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:000698 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Cat | Osteochondromatosis, EXT1-relatedMondo↗ | c.1468dup · p.(L490Pfs*31) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:002554 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Cat | Porphyria, acute intermittentMondo↗ | c.250G>A · p.(A84T) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:001493 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Cat | Porphyria, acute intermittentMondo↗ | c.826-1G>A F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:001493 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Cat | Porphyria, acute intermittentMondo↗ | c.189dup · p.(L64Sfs*2) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:001493 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Cat | Retinal degeneration IIMondo↗ | c.7584+9T>G F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:001244 |
| Corroborated 2 independent sources agree (OMIA curation, Boeykens 2024). The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it.
The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Cat | Vitamin D-deficiency rickets, type IBMondo↗ | c.1386del · p.(F462Lfs*20) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:002221 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, medium chain, deficiency ofMondo↗ | c.444_445delinsGTTAATTCTCAATATTGTCTAAGAATTATG · p.(T150Ifs*6) UU_Cfam_GSD_1.0 | OMIA:002585 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Amelogenesis imperfecta, ACP4-relatedMondo↗ | c.1189dupG · p.(A397Gfs) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:002177 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Ataxia, cerebellar, ATP1B2-relatedMondo↗ | ATP1B2 c.130_131ins[LT796559.1:g.50_276] CanFam3.1 | OMIA:002110 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Bardet-Biedl syndrome 4Mondo↗ | c.58A>T · p.(K20*) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:002045 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Cleft lip with or without cleft palate, ADAMTS20-relatedMondo↗ | ADAMTS20 c.1358_1359del · p.(K453Ifs*4) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:001140 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Darier diseaseMondo↗ | c.2098-3_2098-2insN[(205)] · p.(T700Vfs*6) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:002265 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Dermatosparaxis Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (dEDS), ADAMTS2-relatedMondo↗ | c.769C>T · p.(R257*) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:000328 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Dermatosparaxis Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (dEDS), ADAMTS2-relatedMondo↗ | c.10del · p.(P4Rfs*175) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:000328 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Episodic falling, BCAN-relatedMondo↗ | BCAN c.-13991_466+85delinsGGCCTT CanFam3.1 | OMIA:001592 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Exercise induced metabolic myopathyMondo↗ | c.1728C>A · p.(Y576*) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:002140 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Familial adenomatous polyposisMondo↗ | c.[462_463delinsTT] · p.(K155*) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:001916 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Glaucoma, primary open angle, ADAMTS10-relatedMondo↗ | ADAMTS10 c.1981G>A · p.(G661R) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:001870 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Glaucoma, primary open angle, ADAMTS10-relatedMondo↗ | ADAMTS10 c.1159G>A · p.(A387T) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:001870 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Glaucoma, primary open angle, ADAMTS17-relatedMondo↗ | ADAMTS17 c.194_213del · p.(L68Gfs*) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:001976 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Glaucoma, primary open angle, ADAMTS17-relatedMondo↗ | ADAMTS17 c.1721+2668_*4831255inv CanFam3.1 | OMIA:001976 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Glycogen storage disease IIIaMondo↗ | AGL c.4223del · p.(K1408Sfs*6) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:001577 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Hyperoxaluria, primary, type I (Oxalosis I)Mondo↗ | c.304G>A · p.(G102S) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:001672 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | HypophosphatasiaMondo↗ | ALPL c.1301T>G · p.(V434G) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:002162 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Ichthyosis, ABHD5-relatedMondo↗ | c.1006_1019del · p.(D336Sfs*6) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:002368 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Intestinal cobalamin malabsorption, AMN-relatedMondo↗ | c.3G>A · p.(M1?) ROS_Cfam_1.0 | OMIA:000565 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Intestinal cobalamin malabsorption, AMN-relatedMondo↗ | c.1113_1145del · p.(G372_A382del) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:000565 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Lens luxationMondo↗ | ADAMTS17 c.1473+1G>A CanFam3.1 | OMIA:000588 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Lipid malabsorption, ACSL5-relatedMondo↗ | g.23380074_23483377del CanFam3.1 | OMIA:002226 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Lysosomal storage disease, ARSG relatedMondo↗ | ARSG c.296G>A · p.(R99H) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:001503 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Mucopolysaccharidosis VIMondo↗ | c.-24_32del CanFam3.1 | OMIA:000666 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Mucopolysaccharidosis VIMondo↗ | c.103_124del · p.(A35Gfs*108) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:000666 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Mucopolysaccharidosis VIMondo↗ | c.295C>T · p.(Q99*) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:000666 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis, 12Mondo↗ | ATP13A2 c.1623del CanFam3.1 | OMIA:001552 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Neutropenia, cyclicMondo↗ | c.2407_2408insA · p.(T803Nfs*5) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:000248 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Persistent Mullerian duct syndrome, AMHR2-relatedMondo↗ | c.262C>T · p.(R88*) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:002775 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Pontocerebellar hypoplasia, AMPD2-relatedMondo↗ | c.2131del · p.(D711Mfs12*) UU_Cfam_GSD_1.0 | OMIA:002838 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Recurrent inflammatory pulmonary diseaseMondo↗ | AKNA c.2717_2720delACAG · p.(D906Afs*173) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:002205 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Respiratory distress syndrome, ANLN-relatedMondo↗ | ANLN c.31C>T · p.(R11*) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:002539 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Retinal atrophy - Cone-rod dystrophy 3Mondo↗ | — | OMIA:001520 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Scott SyndromeMondo↗ | ANO6 c.1934+1G>A CanFam3.1 | OMIA:001353 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Stargardt disease 1Mondo↗ | ABCA4 c.4176dup · p.(F1393Lfs*3) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:002179 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Dog | Succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiencyMondo↗ | c.866G>A · p.(G288D) CanFam3.1 ⚠ The cDNA and protein annotations here are internally inconsistent (they cannot both be correct). Shown as-is from the source; our frame check flagged it for review. | OMIA:002250 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Horse | Androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS)Mondo↗ | c.1630_1654del EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000991 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Horse | Androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS)Mondo↗ | c.2042G>C · p.(W681S) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000991 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | c.1960G>A · p.(G654R) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | c.1805C>T · p.(A602V) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | c.2151C>G · p.(Y717*) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | c.706A>T · p.(K236*) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | c.2222-1G>A EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | c.2684+1G>A EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | c.2472+5G>C EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | c.1346+1G>A EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | g.79544206A>T EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | c.2193delG · p.(T732Qfs*9) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | c.1126_1129del · p.(E376Ffs*3) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | c.559_563del · p.(S187Rfs*10) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | g.79548925_79550822del EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | c.2369delC · p.(A790Efs*20) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | c.30_31insT · p.(L11Sfs*115) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Horse | Dwarfism, ACAN-relatedMondo↗ | c.245del · p.(K82Rfs*54) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:001271 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Horse | Glycogen storage disease IVMondo↗ | c.102C>A · p.(Y34*) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000420 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Horse | Incontinentia pigmentiMondo↗ | c.184C>T · p.(R62*) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:001899 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Horse | Polysaccharide storage myopathy/PSSM1/Exertional rhabdomyolysisMondo↗ | c.926G>A · p.(R309H) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:001158 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Horse | ThrombastheniaMondo↗ | c.215G>C · p.(R72P) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:001000 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Pathogenic | Horse | ThrombastheniaMondo↗ | g.19247983_19247992del EquCab3.0 | OMIA:001000 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Cat | Cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic, MYH7-relatedMondo↗ | c.5647G>A · p.(E1883K) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:002212 |
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Cat | classical Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (cEDS), COL5A1-relatedMondo↗ | XM_023242950.2c.3423del · p.(L1142Sfs*134) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:002165 |
| Corroborated 2 independent sources agree (OMIA curation, Boeykens 2024). The evidence behind the grade:
The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Cat | Forebrain commissural malformation, ventriculomegaly and interhemispheric cysts, GDF7-related | c.221_227del · p.(R74Pfs*17) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:002366 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP/P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Cat | Methaemoglobinaemia, CYB5R3-relatedMondo↗ | c.547G>A · p.(G183S) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:002131 |
| Corroborated 2 independent sources agree (OMIA curation, Boeykens 2024). The evidence behind the grade:
The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Cat | Methaemoglobinaemia, CYB5R3-relatedMondo↗ | c.226+5G>A F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:002131 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP/P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Cat | Muscular dystrophy, Duchenne typeMondo↗ | — | OMIA:001081 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP/P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Cat | Osteogenesis imperfecta, CREB3L1-relatedMondo↗ | c.370_371del · p.(C124Lfs) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:002533 |
| Corroborated 2 independent sources agree (OMIA curation, Boeykens 2024). The evidence behind the grade:
The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Cat | Porphyria, acute intermittentMondo↗ | c.445C>T · p.(R149W) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:001493 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP/P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Cat | Porphyria, acute intermittentMondo↗ | c.107_110del · p.(D36Vfs*6) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:001493 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP/P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Dog | Bardet-Biedl syndrome 2Mondo↗ | BBS2 c.1222G>C · p.(A408P) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:002484 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP/P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Dog | Geleophysic dysplasia, ADAMTSL2-relatedMondo↗ | ADAMTSL2 c.661C>T · p.(R221C) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:001509 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP/P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Dog | Glaucoma, primary open angle, ADAMTS17-relatedMondo↗ | ADAMTS17 c.1552G>A · p.(G518S) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:001976 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP/P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Dog | Ichthyosis, ASPRV1-relatedMondo↗ | c.1052T>C · p.(L351P) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:002099 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP/P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Dog | Lens luxationMondo↗ · Glaucoma, primary open angle, ADAMTS17-relatedMondo↗ | ADAMTS17 c.3069_3074del · p.(V1024_V1025del) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:000588 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP/P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Dog | Mucopolysaccharidosis VIMondo↗ | c.910G>A · p.(G304R) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:000666 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP/P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Dog | Neonatal encephalopathy with seizures, ATF2-relatedMondo↗ | ATF2 c.152T>G · p.(M51R) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:001471 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP/P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Dog | Neurodegenerative vacuolar storage diseaseMondo↗ | ATG4D c.1288G>A · p.(A430T) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:001954 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP/P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Dog | Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis, 12Mondo↗ | ATP13A2 c.1118C>T · p.(T373I) CanFam3.1 | OMIA:001552 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP/P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Dog | Polyneuropathy, ARHGEF10-relatedMondo↗ | c.1955_1958+6del CanFam3.1 | OMIA:001917 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP/P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Horse | Androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS)Mondo↗ | c.1A>G EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000991 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP/P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Horse | Androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS)Mondo↗ | c.183del · p.(R63Gfs) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000991 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP/P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | c.1789G>A · p.(G597R) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP/P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | c.1597T>C · p.(C533R) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP/P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | c.2489A>T · p.(K830I) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP/P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | c.338-1G>C EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP/P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | c.2392_2445del · p.(H798_N815del) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP/P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | c.2349+1G>A EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP/P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | g.79579925_79581197del EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP/P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | c.2021T>A · p.(L674H) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP/P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Horse | Dwarfism, ACAN-relatedMondo↗ | c.1513G>C · p.(A505P) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:001271 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP/P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic / pathogenic | Horse | Dwarfism, ACAN-relatedMondo↗ | c.7633_7653del · p.(F2545_C2551del) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:001271 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP/P · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic | Cat | Epidermolysis bullosa, junctionalis, COL17A1-relatedMondo↗ | c.769+5G>A · p.(V257Gfs*82) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:002793 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic | Cat | Wilson diseaseMondo↗ | c.3890C>G · p.(T1297R) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:001071 |
| Likely pathogenic | Dog | Cardiomyopathy, dilated, ABCC9-relatedMondo↗ | c.3557G>A · p.(R1186Q) Dog10K_Boxer_Tasha | OMIA:002710 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic | Dog | Darier diseaseMondo↗ | c.2425A>C · p.(N809H) UU_Cfam_GSD_1.0 | OMIA:002265 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic | Horse | Androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS)Mondo↗ | c.2132C>T · p.(A711V) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000991 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | c.668T>C · p.(L223P) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | c.1473T>G · p.(C491W) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | c.[2000A>T;2021T>C] · p.[(E667D);(L674P)] EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Likely pathogenic | Horse | Dwarfism, ACAN-relatedMondo↗ | c.1270C>T · p.(V424M) EquCab3.0 ⚠ The cDNA and protein annotations here are internally inconsistent (they cannot both be correct). Shown as-is from the source; our frame check flagged it for review. | OMIA:001271 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely pathogenic | Horse | Night blindness, congenital stationary, GRM6-relatedMondo↗ | c.533C>T · p.(T178M) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:002692 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LP · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Uncertain significance | Cat | Cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic, ALMS1-relatedMondo↗ | c.11647G>C · p.(G3883R) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:002316 |
| Uncertain significance | Cat | Cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic, TNNT2-relatedMondo↗ | c.95-108G>A Felis_catus_9.0 | OMIA:002304 |
| Uncertain significance | Cat | Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, TAC3-relatedMondo↗ | c.220G>A · p.(V74M) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:002219 |
| Uncertain significance | Cat | Mucopolysaccharidosis VIMondo↗ | c.1558G>A · p.(D520N) F.catus_Fca126_mat1.0 | OMIA:000666 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — VUS · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Uncertain significance | Dog | Ichthyosis, ASPRV1-relatedMondo↗ | c.594_595del · p.(L199Rfs*342) UU_Cfam_GSD_1.0 | OMIA:002099 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — VUS · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Uncertain significance | Horse | Atlanto occipital fusion | — | OMIA:000081 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — VUS · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Uncertain significance | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | c.856G>A · p.(G286R) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — VUS · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Uncertain significance | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | c.2536del · p.(S846Vfs*15) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — VUS · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Uncertain significance / likely benign | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | c.756+1G>C EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — VUS/LB · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
| Likely benign / benign | Horse | Coat colour, dominant whiteMondo↗ | c.2878G>A · p.(A960T) EquCab3.0 | OMIA:000209 |
| Documented by a single curated source. The evidence behind the grade: Why this grade — LB/B · criteria at least one reviewer applied
Criteria at least one of the three or more reviewers considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The reviewers agreed on the grade, not necessarily on every criterion behind it. The per-criteria AVCG codes above and the supporting evidence are from OMIA's CC-BY classification download and the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 guidelines. AVCG classification is ~65% reproducible between independent experts, which is why the rationale is shown, not just the label. Corroboration compares the OMIA-curated grade against the independent published grade. | ||||
Each variant was classified independently by three or more reviewers. Each reviewer applied the AVCG criteria and assigned a grade, and the grades were then compared. Where reviewers agreed on the final grade, the individual criteria behind it were not necessarily reconciled. So the criteria shown here are the union of the reviewers' assessments: every criterion that at least one reviewer considered fulfilled, not a per-criterion consensus. The agreement is on the grade, not on each criterion.
Scope. The AVCG applies to single-gene disorders: variants in one gene with a high impact on disease risk, where one variant is sufficient (though not always fully penetrant) to cause disease. Grades follow the Animal Variant Classification Guidelines (AVCG; Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024, Front Vet Sci 11:1497817), an ACMG/AMP-style scheme; the species-specific feline application is validated in Boeykens et al. 2024 (Front Vet Sci 11:1327081; erratum 11:1458433). Classifications are curated in OMIA. Beyond the 142 graded variants, 6 are out-of-scope and 2 currently unresolved under the AVCG scope.
Evidence behind the grade. Where the OMIA-curated grade is independently corroborated by the published guideline, the variant carries a green Corroborated tag; open it for the supporting evidence (in-silico predictions, population genotype counts, mutant allele frequency, the human ortholog). 9 of the 142 are corroborated this way today, from the Boeykens, Broeckx et al. 2024 supplements (CC-BY); the remainder rest on a single curated source and show the grade alone, gaining evidence as it is added. Each variant's expanded view now shows the per-criteria AVCG breakdown in plain language, alongside the supporting evidence (see "How to read these criteria" below). Where sources disagree, the grade is flagged Contested and the disagreement shown, not overwritten.
Attribution. A grade is an AVCG classification curated in OMIA. Credit: AVCG (Boeykens et al. 2024) and OMIA. A grade describes the documented variant's causality, not a per-animal prediction: penetrance, modifier loci, and environment govern whether a carrier ever shows the phenotype.
In the knowledge graph. Each disease is cross-referenced to its canonical Mondo identifier (75 of the diseases here), so a classification links straight into the Monarch knowledge graph, where its human-disease analog and phenotypes live, the Mondo↗ link by each disease opens that term. Mondo is the cross-resource disease ontology (Vasilevsky, Mungall et al. 2025; CC-BY 4.0); the OMIA cross-references are Mondo's own curated mappings, OMIA remains the canonical source of the classification itself. Breed identifiers are reconciled to VBO, FCI, iDog and VeNom as a published SSSOM mapping set.
Query it. Built for pipelines and reference, not just reading: the same classifications are agent-callable through the Sniff MCP server (Streamable HTTP, mcp.sniff.world/mcp/) and the grounded Ask endpoint, returning the grade, its OMIA source, and how sure we are, cited.
Auto-generated from the sources of the classifications shown above.
- Boeykens F, ... Broeckx BJG, et al. Development and validation of animal variant classification guidelines. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1497817. doi:10.3389/fvets.2024.1497817 · CC-BY-4.0
- Nicholas, F.W., Tammen, I., & Sydney Informatics Hub. (2026). Online Mendelian Inheritance in Animals (OMIA) [dataset]. https://omia.org. doi:10.25910/2AMR-PV70. (Platform papers: Nicholas FW, NAR 2003 doi:10.1093/nar/gkg074; Lenffer J et al., NAR 2006 doi:10.1093/nar/gkj152.) · CC-BY-4.0